0
0
0
0
Not buying Samsung. They keep downgrading their regular and Plus models. There is indeed rumors the S23 and 23 will have worse bezels and weaker haptic motor. These phones have come loss leaders to push deals for the Ultra model.If Realme can equip a flagship with a flat6.7 QHD panel how come Samsung can not for the S21/22/23? The answer is they do not want to. It’s one in a long line ofanti-consumer strategies from this company.
Samsung,” we want a more important Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Version, like a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Plus interpretation”Qualcomm sends an option of an Overlooked interpretation, with no information on battery and thermals. Hopefully, Samsung tested those, without counting on Qualcomm.No way) we had everytime Exynos crap then. anyway i do nt like OC performances, its gibberish, cpu is powerfull enuff
We are going to still see Tensor chips and possible A series Exynos. I would not be too upset. Samsung just needs to make sure 3 nm is good and also Exynos will be back and better than everHigh frequence interpretation. How the tables have turned. Flash back 7 times ago that Samsung designedly vended a Snapdragon variant which is slower than the fellow Snapdragon phones from other brands that time?
On the other I was kind of hoping that Samsung would pigheadedly push on with Exynos until they’re a match for Snapdragon.The total dominance of Qualcomm isn’t a good thing and is driving up prices as they can charge whatever for their chips.arm wants to terminate qualcomm core and armature agreement if qualcomm does nt destroy nuvia ip and cores and fully drops them and doesntuse them in their products
From what I’ve seen, the Exynos performances generally are n’t only slower but also have some combination of stutters worse camera/ worse battery life/ worse thermalsI mean numerous of us use phone for calling, streaming, browsing and photography so really a chipset with decent power is good I mean we treat exynos like it has pets slower than the iPhone 3gs
